
Here are answers to the most common questions I get asked about my time as a county commissioner
and the decisions I made while serving.
What I inherited, what we did, and the fee waiver
What the voters decided, and what the community did next
What we did and why
What I said at that forum, and why I'd say it again
What it says and why I wrote it
Here's where we stand. We live in a nation of laws, and laws are meant to be enforced. We don't agree with everything the federal government does. We do believe immigration laws are on the books for a reason, and that when federal agencies are enforcing them, local government should cooperate rather than obstruct. Oregon has its own sanctuary statute, and the resolution doesn't override it. It says what this Board believes, and it says the County will work with federal partners to the full extent the law allows. The Sheriff runs the Sheriff's Office. The Board funds it and backs it.
Why I fight for it, and who I answer to
What the County has done, and what I've asked Roseburg to do
"What are you doing about the homeless problem?" I get asked that more than anything else, and I understand why. Anyone who drives through Roseburg sees it. So here's what I've done, and what I keep asking for.
Start with Sutherlin, because it worked. The city manager called me. The city had just finished its downtown project, Central Avenue was paved and looking good, and people were camping all over it. He asked what to do. I told him what I've told every city in this county: designate a place. Once people have a designated place to be, you can enforce the law everywhere else. Court rulings are clear that if a city doesn't provide a place, people can camp on public property. Give them a place and the rest of the town gets its sidewalks back.
The County owned a piece of land at the edge of Sutherlin, next to the industrial park. We'd gotten it from the city years earlier for the industrial-park expansion. Commissioner Freeman, Commissioner Kress and I deeded it back. The city built Hastings Village on it, opened in 2021, and made it Sutherlin's designated site. Downtown Sutherlin is a different place today. That's the model. The County provided the land. The city provided the will.
Before that, one of the first things this Board did on homelessness was deal with the little scraps of county land where camps kept forming: unused road rights-of-way and odd parcels, a lot of them down around Southgate. As long as they were public land, nobody could do anything. So we conveyed them to the adjacent private owners, and where two owners had a claim, we auctioned the piece. Private land can be posted and trespassed. And every one of those parcels went back on the tax rolls. That was more than ten years ago.
Now Roseburg. I want to be careful here, because this is where people think I'm passing the buck, and I'm not. County commissioners have no authority inside city limits. Roseburg, Winston, Sutherlin, Myrtle Creek, every city has its own government and its own responsibility for what happens inside its boundaries. The County is a support agency. We can't tell a city council what to do but sometimes we can help them do it. What I can do is bring them a plan, and I have.
A property owner on the edge of Diamond Lake Boulevard offered a parcel for a homelessness project, willing to donate it for a tax credit. I went to a local engineering firm and had them draw a site plan: small three-sided shelters, eight feet by eight, with a low-voltage outlet to charge a phone; coin-operated lockers so people could leave camp without losing everything they own; coin-operated restrooms; a tent area; a few spaces for people sleeping in cars. A pilot, not a fix for everything, but a real place. I had the land and I had the drawing. I took it to the people who controlled the council's agenda. It never got on the agenda.
Later I was seated on the Roseburg Homeless Commission. The commission can't decide anything; it can only recommend to the council. So I made a motion: recommend that the council designate a site, one it owns or one it buys, by a specific date about four months out. Discussion opened on all the reasons it couldn't be done. The motion never got a second. I resigned not long after, because I have a lot of work in front of me that actually gets things done, and that wasn't going to be one of them.
What we did and why
Champagne Creek is 205 acres out past Lookingglass that used to be a county dump and transfer site. It had been closed for about 30 years. The county still carried the obligations that come with a closed waste site, there was no public access, and nobody could build on it or wanted to buy it. In the county's own words at the time, it was "nonpublic access, unproductive," and a liability. Somebody will show you an assessor's number for the parcels. An assessor's number is not a price. A closed dump with monitoring obligations does not sell.
In 2017 our first idea was to keep it and build a county off-road vehicle park there. The neighbors did not want that, and they said so. We listened and dropped it. In 2018 the county leased the ground to a local group so search and rescue volunteers could train on it. That turned out to be the right use, so in November 2019 the Board ended the lease and granted the land outright to Champagne Creek Ranch, a nonprofit formed that year by the people who had been running the search and rescue lease, to take it on for good. Oregon law lets a county grant land to a qualifying nonprofit to provide a needed public service. The grant agreement requires the ranch to let Douglas County Search and Rescue train there at no charge, and it took the liability off the taxpayers for good.
That's what the ranch has done. Search and rescue trains there. Wildland firefighters and backcountry rescue crews train there. Law enforcement trains there. The kids' mountain bike race team rides there. The ranch runs youth OHV safety classes and holds a couple of events a year that raise money for local charities and food drives. The agencies pay nothing to use it.
Who runs the nonprofit? A five-person board of volunteer citizens.
The county harvested the mature timber off the property and replanted it before giving it away.
Do I use it? I've driven in the ranch's poker run and donated significantly to their food drives the same as everyone else who bought a ticket.
The land decision was made in November 2019.
Thirty years of a fenced-off liability turned into a place where the people who pull our neighbors out of the woods go to practice. I'd make that decision again tomorrow.
The questions people have asked about me